AI助手支持GPT4.0
公众号虽小，也是我的心血，昨天我的公众号【思深行远】被机器判定为永久封停，请问该如何做？谢谢Although the official account is small, it is also my painstaking effort. Yesterday, my official account [Think Deeply and Go Far] was judged to be permanently suspended by the machine. What should I do? thanks
公众号虽小，也是我的心血，昨天我的公众号【思深行远】被机器判定为永久封停，请问该如何做？谢谢
各位审核人员好，昨天（12月13日），我刚刚起步两个月的公众号【思深行远】被机器判定为涉嫌违反相关法律法规，被永久封停。对于一个坚持原创的作者来说，确实是一个很大的打击。
但是我依然认为这是一个误判，至少不应该是永久封停的程度。
这是申诉失败的截图：
首先，我依然申明：
自运营以来，文章都是谈论思维方式的，也是努力弘扬正向价值观的，从来没有恶意违反相关法律法规的做法和想法，之前所有的文章都可以证明。
针对此次事故，我已经认真检讨并且分析了，以后不会犯同样的错误。再次感谢！
其次，我截取这篇违规文章中的一部分进行说明（原文太长，无法插入）：
文章的第一部分提出了一个现实问题：
第二部分是三种哲学思想对这个现象的概括以及分析：
第三部分是一个概括：
整篇文章，是基于问题进行讨论的，主观上，没有任何的政治立场，也没有故意违反法律法规。
我能想到的，或许是这一点不合适：
这里出现了“意识形态”四个字，或许是触发到了机器判断的红线。
但是无论如何，我没有主观恶意性。
我希望能适当减轻处罚。当然，我会吸取这次教训，不再出现类似的问题。
最后，我提供一些我之前的原创的文章截图，证明我的公众号确实是讨论思维，而且是努力弘扬正向价值观的：
总览：
这是第23期内容的一部分：
这是第22期内容的一部分：
这是第21期内容的一部分：
这是第20期内容的一部分：
其他谈论思维方式的文章，我就不放了，大致都是这样的内容。
每一篇文章都是我自己原创的，这么多东西忽然没有了，真的很难受。
这次我错了，也希望能给我一个机会，而不是一棒子打死，这才是对创作者真正的鼓励。
希望各位审核人员能给予一个公正的评判。
谢谢。
其他：
我的微信公众号账号邮箱：1943336161@qq.com
APPID由于封号，无法获得
Hello, reviewers, Yesterday (December 13th), I just started official account for two months. [thinking deeply and going far] it was judged by the machine that it was suspected of violating relevant laws and regulations and was permanently suspended. It was really a great blow to an author who insisted on originality. However, I still think this is a misjudgment, at least not the degree of permanent suspension. This is a screenshot of the failure of application: first of all, I still state that since the operation, the articles have talked about thinking It is also an effort to promote positive values. There has never been any practice or idea of maliciously violating relevant laws and regulations, which can be proved by all previous articles. I have carefully reviewed and analyzed the accident and will not make the same mistake in the future. Thanks again! secondly, I intercepted part of this illegal article for explanation (the original text is too long to insert): the first part of the article puts forward a practical problem: the second part is the summary and analysis of this phenomenon by three philosophical thoughts: the third part is a summary: the whole article is discussed based on the problem. Subjectively, there is no political position or intentional violation of laws and regulations. What I can think of may be This is inappropriate: the word "ideology" appears here, which may trigger the red line of machine judgment. But anyway, I have no subjective malice. I hope the punishment can be appropriately mitigated. Of course, I will learn from this lesson and there will be no similar problems. Finally, I provide some screenshots of my original articles, which show that my official account is really a discussion of thinking, and is also an effort to promote positive values: a summary: This is part of the twenty-third phase: This is part of the twenty-second phase: This is part of the twenty-first phase: This is part of the twentieth issue: other articles about ways of thinking. I won't let it go. It's mostly like this. Every article is my own original, so many things suddenly gone, it's really hard. I was wrong this time. I also hope to give me a chance instead of killing me with a stick. This is the real encouragement to the creator. I hope all auditors can give a fair judgment. thank you. Other: my WeChat official account number box: 1943336161@qq.com Appid cannot be obtained due to seal number
我似乎在第20期内容的一部分看到了大量违禁词