关于小程序盗版侵权投诉的问题，为什么不能严重处罚封号下架？Regarding the issue of complaints about piracy and infringement of small programs, why can't we severely penalize the suspension?
关于小程序盗版侵权投诉的问题，为什么不能严重处罚封号下架？大家都知道 别人线上运营的小程序源码 随手就拔下来了
小修小改就能放上自己小程序用。
我现在就遇到这个情况，小程序被人扒了 然后直接把我原版 原封不动的上架到另一个小程序。 什么都不修改 ，甚至里面的 API地址用的都是我的。。。
经过后台投诉侵权 已经审核成功 对方小程序也遭到冻结了。，。
但是才过几天，， 对方小程序 小修小改后 又在原冻结号 上架了，，而且就是改变了一些UI界面
里面的API地址 还是我的。。 然后微信居然还给她上架了 我是服了！
我想说 盗版侵权 就这么处理的吗? 冻结两三天 改改UI又能上架了？
We all know that the source code of other people's online small programs can be pulled down easily, and small repairs and changes can be put into their own small programs. I now encounter this situation. The applet is picked up, and then directly put my original version on the shelf to another applet. Nothing is modified, and even the API address in it is mine... After the background complaint, the infringement has been reviewed successfully, and the other party's applet has been frozen.,. But only a few days later, the other party's small program was put on the shelf on the original freeze number after minor repairs and changes, and the API address in some UI interfaces was still mine.. Then wechat actually put her on the shelf. I'm convinced! I want to say, is piracy handled like this? Frozen for two or three days, can the UI be put on the shelf again?
回答：
维权比较麻烦，小程序前端被扒习惯就好。
如果API是自己的可以考虑做好加密，也可以使用云函数进行中转请求，增加安全性。
1、“盗版侵权”，前提是你要有版权，能提供出来吗？
2、“改改UI又能上架了”，不改UI都能上架。本身这这是允许的事，（某些小程序模板，上线几百几千个都行）
3、API居然谁都可以调用？这得心有多大？还是安全水平有多低？
群主管理都是支付大佬
这个没办法的，还是想想怎么运营~